- Page 1 of 327
- 3 ...
(AP Photo/Al Behrman)
Game 1: 4-1 win on Friday night (July 25)
Game 2: 1-0 loss on Saturday (July 26)
Game 3: 4-2 win on Sunday afternoon (July 27)
1. Another series win
The Nats now are 12-1-2 in series with at least two games played since May 30. The lone series loss for the Nats during this stretch: the three-game sweep at St. Louis in mid-June.
The Nats’ longest winning streak this season is just four games. The Nats lack a true MVP or Cy Young candidate. But they exited this series with the best record in the National League (57-45) and with the best run differential in the N.L. (+75). This isn’t a sexy team; it’s just a good one.
2. The starting pitching was excellent
Tanner Roark allowed one run in seven innings in Game 1.
Gio Gonzalez allowed one run in seven innings in Game 2, recording eight strikeouts.
Doug Fister tossed seven scoreless innings in Game 3.
3. The offense struggled after Game 1
The Nats totaled 12 hits in Game 1 but just nine hits the rest of the series.
Shortstop Ian Desmond went 1-for-12 with a walk in the series. He got caught stealing in the top of the ninth of Game 2.
Left fielder Bryce Harper went 1-for-10 with three walks in the series. He committed two base-running blunders in Game 2, getting doubled off first base in the top of the second off a line drive by catcher Wilson Ramos and getting thrown out at third on a Ramos infield single in the top of the seventh.
4. There were offensive bright spots
The Nats totaled 15 walks in the series.
Center fielder Denard Span went 5-for-10 with four walks and a stolen base in the series. He had a four-hit performance in Game 1 and a four-walk performance in Game 3.
Ramos went 4-for-9 over Games 1 and 2 and did not play in Game 3.
5. The bullpen was mostly good
Nats relievers combined to allow two runs in five innings, recording seven strikeouts.
The lone hiccup came in the ninth inning of Game 3. Rookie Aaron Barrett allowed back-to-back singles to the only two batters he faced, and then closer Rafael Soriano gave up a two-run double to the first batter he faced.
View Comments (0)
Game 1: 4-0 win on Thursday night (July 24)
Game 2: 2-1 10-inning win on Friday night (July 25)
Game 3: 4-3 loss on Saturday (July 26)
Game 4: 3-2 10-inning win on Sunday (July 27)
1. Great trip
The O’s with this series concluded a 6-4 road trip at the top three teams in American League West (Oakland, the Angels and the Mariners). Four of the wins were by two runs or fewer.
2. The starting pitching was good with the exception of one game
Wei-Yin Chen tossed eight scoreless innings in Game 1.
Kevin Gausman allowed one run in 6 2/3 innings in Game 2, though he did give up seven hits and three walks.
Bud Norris allowed four runs in five innings in Game 3, giving up six hits, three walks and a hit-by-pitch versus six strikeouts.
Miguel Gonzalez allowed one run in six innings in Game 4, though he did give up eight hits and two walks.
3. The bullpen was excellent
Orioles relievers combined to allow just one run in 11 1/3 innings in the series, recording 16 strikeouts.
T.J. McFarland totaled 3 2/3 scoreless innings in the series.
Brian Matusz totaled five strikeouts in 2 2/3 scoreless innings in the series.
Closer Zach Britton totaled four strikeouts in two perfect innings in the series.
4. The offense was bad
The O’s batted just .191 (26-for-136) in the series.
The O’s totaled no walks over Games 1 and 2 but then amassed 12 walks over Games 3 and 4.
5. Third baseman Manny Machado was back
He returned from a four-game absence caused by back spasms, going 0-for-4 with two strikeouts in Game 3 but then providing two singles (including an RBI infield single), a go-ahead RBI sac fly in the top of the 10th and a run in Game 4.
View Comments (0)
(AP Photo/Chris Schneider)
Game 1: 7-2 win on Monday night (July 21)
Game 2: 7-4 win on Tuesday night (July 22)
Game 3: 6-4 loss on Wednesday (July 23)
1. Third baseman/left fielder Ryan Zimmerman is out again
He suffered a right hamstring strain in Game 2 and was placed on the 15-day disabled list on Wednesday.
Zimmerman has been a very good offensive player and deserves a lot of credit for the way he has handled his transition this season from being a full-time third baseman. But there’s no getting around the fact that he’s injury prone. Here is Zimmerman’s major injury history:
• Earlier this season: missed 44 games due to a right thumb fracture
• 2013: missed 14 games due to a left hamstring strain
• 2012: missed 13 games due to right shoulder inflammation
• 2011: missed 58 games with a left abdominal injury
• 2010: missed the final 10 games due to a rib injury
• 2008: missed 48 games due to a small labral tear in his left shoulder
And as any Nats fan knows, Zimmerman isn’t the only injury-prone regular. Catcher Wilson Ramos and outfielder Bryce Harper have struggled to stay healthy. So three of the Nats’ eight regular position-players can’t stay on the field, at least so far.
When Zimmerman has been in the Nats’ starting lineup this season, they are 33-19 and average 4.9 runs per game.
2. Right fielder Jayson Werth missed time, too
He didn’t start in Game 3 due to his right knee, but he did provide an RBI single in the top of the ninth.
3. The offense was good, though not clutch
The Nats batted .310 (36-for-116) in the series.
Shortstop Ian Desmond had five hits (two-run homer and four singles), two RBI and three runs in Game 1. He finished the series 8-for-13.
Center fielder Denard Span had four singles in Game 3 and finished the series 5-for-13 with two walks and a stolen base.
Second baseman Danny Espinosa started for just the third time this month in Game 1 and make manager Matt Williams look pretty smart: RBI triple, RBI double, walk and a run. Espinosa finished the series 3-for-10 with a walk and a stolen base.
The Nats did go just 8-for-44 with runners in scoring position in the series.
4. The starting pitching was bad
Not often recently that we’ve been able to say that about the Nats, but this was not a good series for the rotation.
Doug Fister allowed two runs in 5 2/3 innings in Game 1, giving up nine hits and two walks and lasting for just 85 pitches.
Jordan Zimmermann returned from a biceps strain in Game 2 but struggled: four runs in five innings on eight hits, including two homers, on 76 pitches. He did have six strikeouts.
Stephen Strasburg struggled in Game 3: four runs in 5 1/3 innings on nine hits and three walks versus five strikeouts on 100 pitches. Three of the runs came in the first inning; Strasburg now has a 5.32 ERA in the first innings of games this season.
Strasburg’s Game 3 outing also continued a trend. He’s now has a 5.09 ERA on the road this season versus a 2.62 ERA at home.
5. The bullpen was good
Nats relievers combined to allow two runs (one earned) in 10 innings in the series.
View Comments (0)
Game 1: 4-2 win on Monday night (July 21)
Game 2: 4-2 win on Tuesday night (July 22)
Game 3: 3-2 loss on Wednesday night (July 23)
1. The starting pitching was good
Bud Norris allowed two runs (one earned) in 6 2/3 innings in Game 1, recording eight strikeouts versus eight hits and two walks.
Miguel Gonzalez allowed two runs in 7 2/3 innings in Game 2, giving up just three hits and four walks.
Chris Tillman allowed one run in six innings in Game 3.
2. The offense struggled
The O’s batted just .192 (19-for-99) in the series, during which they totaled just four walks.
The O’s have seven hits or less in 10 of their last 11 games, batting just .205 during the stretch.
3. Third baseman Manny Machado missed Games 2 and 3 due to back spasms
This was disappointing given his recent surge: 1.104 OPS since his five-game suspension.
4. An offensive bright spot was center fielder Adam Jones
He hit two two-run homers in Game 1 and had an RBI single in Game 3. Jones and outfielder Steve Pearce each exited the series leading the O’s with a 3.3 Baseball Reference WAR.
5. The bullpen was fine until Game 3
Tommy Hunter allowed two runs in 1 2/3 innings in Game 3, giving up three walks, a single and a double. One of the runs scored on a bases-loaded walk by Brian Matusz, who walked the only batter he faced.
O’s relievers combined for 3 2/3 scoreless innings in Games 1 and 2.
View Comments (0)
(AP Photo/Nick Wass)
1. Defensive coordinator Jim Haslett, like RGIII, appears liberated
Our ESPN 980 Redskins insider Chris Russell has spoken about how former head coach Mike Shanahan at times dictated to Haslett how to call his defense: zone as opposed to man coverage, focus on stopping the run before anything else, etc. Haslett on multiple occasions this offseason has essentially said that he will now play his players to their strengths, clearly implying that that was not the case in the past. Haslett’s entering his fifth season as the Redskins’ defensive coordinator, and the defense has been a problem to some extent in each of his first four seasons with the team.
I do believe that Shanahan did get in Haslett’s way to the detriment of the defense at times, but I’m also not naïve enough to believe that, as with the RGIII-Shanahan relationship, the problems were all on the now-fired head coach.
What’s maybe most interesting about the Redskins’ defense is the extent to which players from a bad unit were re-signed. There are 32 teams in the NFL. The Redskins in 2013 finished:
• 31st in yards allowed per pass attempt (8.04)
• Tied for 30th in the NFL in fewest points allowed per game (29.9)
• 29th in lowest opponents’ fourth-down conversion percentage (12-for-17 or 70.6 percent)
• 26th in yards after contact allowed
• 11th out of 16 NFC teams in takeaways (26)
• Tied for 21st out of 32 NFL teams in sacks (36)
And yet the Skins re-signed the following defensive players this offseason: linebackers Brian Orakpo, Perry Riley Jr. and Rob Jackson, defensive lineman Chris Baker, corners DeAngelo Hall and E.J. Biggers and safety Brandon Meriweather.
The implication seems pretty clear: the head coach and the scheme were more responsible for last season’s bad defense than the actual players. We shall see.
2. This is a show-me season for Orakpo
He’ll be playing on a one-year, $11.455 million franchise tender, which he signed on March 27 off being franchised on March 3. Orakpo maintains that he’s worth a big-money, long-term contract. It’s telling, though, that after five seasons the Redskins still haven’t given him that deal (the deadline for a longer-term contract for this season came and went on July 15).
Orakpo’s career sack and turnover totals scream that he is a good but not great pass rusher. He’ll supposedly have a chance to rush the passer more this season as opposed to being asked to do things (pass coverage) that weren’t his strengths. This is where the veracity of the Shanahan-restricted-Haslett claim becomes so key.
3. How worried should we be about the Redskins’ biggest free-agent defensive signing?
We learned on June 18 that defensive end Jason Hatcher was to undergo arthroscopic surgery on his left knee and miss four to six weeks. He turned 32 on July 13. The Redskins signed Hatcher to a reported four-year deal with $10.75 million guaranteed on March 14. That’s not big money, but it’s decent money, and it’s for a player who the Redskins are counting on to be starter on a defensive line that needs to generate more push.
Eight of Hatcher's career-best 11 sacks last season came against the NFC East.
4. Keenan Robinson has emerged as the leading candidate to replace London Fletcher as a starting inside linebacker
Two things make this surprising:
1) Robinson has not played in a regular-season game since the Thanksgiving win at Dallas in 2012. He suffered a season-ending torn right pectoral muscle in that game and then suffered a season-ending torn left pectoral muscle on Day 1 of training camp in 2013.
2) The Redskins signed a number of inside linebackers this offseason, including Darryl Sharpton, Adam Hayward and Akeem Jordan (all three of whom, by the way, are said to be quality special-teams players).
Robinson is a 2012 fourth-round pick. He and offensive lineman Tom Compton are what the Redskins obtained via the 2012 fourth-round pick acquired from Oakland for quarterback Jason Campbell in April 2010.
5. Haslett early in the offseason revealed a surprising and important stat
He in February said on multiple shows, including Inside The Locker Room on ESPN 980, that the Redskins were in nickel 62 percent of the time in 2013. This once and for all should end the debate of the 3-4 vs. the 4-3. The significance of a team’s base defensive alignment is overrated, especially in a pass-happy NFL in which teams are playing nickel more often.
View Comments (0)
(AP Photo/Nick Wass)
1. The good regarding RGIII: he seems happy and healthy
Quarterback Robert Griffin III seems to genuinely like new head coach Jay Gruden, who has made it a point to say that he’s going to consult with RGIII on what plays are called. Yes, the two are in the honeymoon stage of their relationship, but this is refreshing given the toxicity of the RGIII-Mike Shanahan relationship.
The most encouraging aspect of RGIII’s offseason is that the brace is off his right knee and, per ESPN 980’s Chris Cooley (who threw with RGIII in the offseason), he looks very good from a mobility standpoint. “How good?” of course is the question, but it’s important to remember that the brace impeded RGIII’s speed last season in addition the actual recovery from surgery, and him being “just fast” in 2013 as opposed to “electrifyingly fast” as he was in 2012 was a big issue last season. Speed can help to cover up a lot of blemishes.
2. The bad regarding RGIII: he couldn’t help himself on multiple occasions
RGIII’s cryptic comments of the 2013 offseason were a major part of his dysfunctional relationship with Shanahan, who himself made a number of mistakes. This has been a quieter offseason, but that doesn’t mean there haven’t been some eye-brow-raising comments from RGIII:
April 2014 - RGIII, in an interview with CSN Washington, described what #TheMovement means: “We’ll actually get a chance to play the brand of football that we want to play, determined by the players, and coach Jay Gruden’s gonna allow us to do that. So whenever you see me tweet #TheMovement, it’s just saying, “What is the movement? What do we want to be known for? And I’ve talked to my teammates about it. We decide what our identity is. We’re gonna play whatever kind of brand of football that we want to play, and that’s part of our movement, and we’re excited about presenting that to the fans this upcoming season. And we can’t promise many things. We can’t promise how many wins or how many losses, but we can promise you this: It’s gonna be exciting.”
July 2014 - RGIII, in an interview with FOXSports.com, said, "What I think is going to help us most this year is that everybody in that building is going to be for us being successful and for us winning. There are no ulterior motives. That will be great. Jay has been phenomenal. (President and general manager) Bruce Allen has done great job of getting the right guys in that locker room. I tip my hat to them. They have given us everything we need to be successful. We're going to work our butts off for them."
July 2014 – RGIII, in an interview on a local radio station, said, “I called [quarterback guru] Terry [Shea], because he was the guy that was there with me when I first came out, to get drafted and work on my craft. So he was a guy that I knew had my best interest at heart. And he knew what I looked like beforehand, before the injury and before some of the mechanical things that I was asked to change.”
Even if RGIII was right in what he was saying in each of these interviews, taking not-so-subtle shots at Shanahan and perhaps others only makes RGIII look petty and small. Does that matter when it comes to how he plays this season? No, but it’s unnecessary and perhaps reveals a lack of self-awareness, which is something that could impact how he plays this season.
Bottom line though, RGIII is a phenomenal talent who works hard and is only two years removed from a historically-successful rookie season. Just because he may be flawed personally (and by the way, how many of us weren't at 24?) doesn't mean he can't get back to being great.
3. The Redskins have, on paper, their best receiving corps since The Posse
Pierre Garcon, DeSean Jackson and Andre Roberts of course have a long way to go before being viewed as favorably as Art Monk, Gary Clark and Ricky Sanders were. But the Redskins haven’t had a top-three at receiver this good since the early 1990s.
4. The Jackson signing is a risk worth taking given the cost
There are many reasons to worry about Jackson as a Redskin, including 1) Even if the alleged gang-ties angle was overblown, why was Philadelphia willing to release him given that he was coming off a career season? and 2) Why didn’t his former head coach, current Kansas City head coach Andy Reid, decide to sign Jackson?
That said, Jackson signed a reported two-year deal with $16 million guaranteed. That’s less guaranteed money than Miami’s Mike Wallace ($30 million), Seattle’s Percy Harvin ($25.5 million) and Minnesota’s Greg Jennings ($17.8 million) have received in recent years, and I would take Jackson over any of those other guys.
5. Change has come for the offensive line, but will it be better?
The Redskins had two major offensive-line signings in free agency (guard Shaun Lauvao and guard/center Mike McGlynn), drafted two offensive linemen in the third round (tackle Morgan Moses and guard Spencer Long) and on March 14 released center Will Montgomery.
The hope is that moving Kory Lichtensteiger from left guard to center and inserting Lauvao (who reportedly signed a four-year deal with $5 million guaranteed) at left guard will fortify the interior, which was the problem last season (right tackle Tyler Polumbus likely graded as the Redskins’ second-best offensive linemen after left tackle Trent Williams according to Cooley, contrary to what many believe). But right guard Chris Chester is coming off a bad season, too.
Backups like Josh LeRibeus (who is in much better shape this year as opposed to showing up overweight last season), Maurice Hurt, Adam Gettis and Tom Compton may be factors, but it’s telling that they haven’t received much playing time the last two seasons.
Another thing to keep in mind: the Redskins have enjoyed incredible health along their offensive line the last two seasons, with just one missed game by a starter (Polumbus didn’t play in the Week 16 win at Philadelphia in 2012 due to a concussion). Will such a remarkable run of health continue in 2014?
View Comments (0)
- Page 1 of 327
- 3 ...
- Five Takeaways From The Nationals Taking Two Of Three At Cincinnati
- Five Takeaways From The Orioles Taking Three Of Four At Seattle
- Five Takeaways From The Nationals Taking Two Of Three At Colorado
- Five Takeaways From The Orioles Taking Two Of Three At The Angels
- 2014 Redskins Offseason: Five Takeaways On Defense